Posts tagged ‘state treasurer’

June 8, 2010

Democrats don’t like Barrett’s proposed “diet”

by thoughtfulconservative

At least one Democrat anyway:

State Treasurer candidate Dan Bohrod today said that he was disappointed in Milwaukee Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tom Barrett’s proposal to eliminate the Office of the State Treasurer, ostensibly to save state tax monies.

via Bohrod Campaign: Bohrod disappointed in Barrett proposal.

Yes, disappointed because he’s running for the office and wants some job security.

Oh, did I read too much into that?

“I’ve been working hard over the last 8 ½ months trying to make the case that the State Treasurer is an important office, but has for many years lacked the appropriate leadership to provide a meaningful contribution to the public discourse as regards important state financial issues,” said Bohrod. “Apparently, I have more work to do.”

You bet you have more work to do! So we really need “ a meaningful contribution to the public discourse as regards important state financial issues” from a position that gets paid $62,000 and change? Don’t we have enough of people already making public discourse?

Look at the lieutenant governor candidates’ websites, those that have them. All of them want to bring jobs to Wisconsin and fix the budget. What’s the trouble? None of them can do a thing about it. The duties of the LG are basically to wait until the governor needs them for something, kinda like a vice-president.

Same with the state treasurer. Candidates can talk all they want about their “two decades of public budgeting experience” but basically they do squat. Yeah, I know their duties. I could probably do that from here in Waukesha on my laptop.

There’s more. Ah, but you knew there was, didn’t you?

“I think any time one Constitutional officer proposes elimination of another, folks should be wary….  Eliminating the Treasurer results only in the stifling of a voice of the people, a duly elected, Constitutional Officer”

Wow. Feelings of patriotism are welling up in my breast. “Stifling a voice of the people!” It must not be! Rally to its defense!

Did the sarcasm drip a little too much there? Sorry. But really, we’re not talking about eliminating an important office, like lieutenant governor or anything like that.

But really, I have never seen three more useless elected offices than lieutenant governor, secretary of state and state treasurer.

April 24, 2010


by thoughtfulconservative

[UPDATE: Mr. Schuller responds more fully on his blog. I’ll assume it’s because he’s new to blogging that he didn’t link this post.]

OK, I got a Facebook invitation from Kurt Schuller, a Republican who’s running for Wisconsin state treasurer. His invitation read,

Kurt says, “I invite my fellow wisconsin [sic] conservatives to help me shrink wisconsins [sic] bloated government. Please consider joining my group. I hope you can support my effort”.

So I’m thinking, “What’s he gonna do?” Treasurers just sign checks in Wisconsin and other stuff.


But I thought, “Well, I’ll click on his web site just for fun.”

Whoa. The dude wants to be the last state treasurer for Wisconsin. He says it will save $3 million or more.

He says the treasurer doesn’t even signs checks– just sits on some boards and oversees stuff.


But $3 million? Really?

Who knows?