“The Enemy God”

A tip of the conservative ball cap to Practically Speaking.

The wife and I will take in the movie “The Enemy God - A Yanomamo Shaman’s Story” this afternoon at Elmbrook Church. This kind of documentary is right up my alley, worldview differences, language, and the Gospel.

The Left would disagree and I don’t expect the film to impress them, but I’ve been there; I’ve lived among people somewhat similar so I am interested.

Then we’ll probably hit some cheap eating place for our anniversary.

UPDATE: Saw the movie. I thought it was confusing and too long, but my wife thought it was OK. I dozed off and on which may account for my being confused. I thought the room was too warm; my wife thought it was fine. Ah, marriage.

Bible and government by Dr. John Cobin - a review - part 3

In this post, I hope to finish the rest of the book that I started with this post and this post.

In chapters 3 and 4 Dr. Cobin gives us his view of popular Biblical views of government. His key premise is that,

With few exceptions over the course of human civilization, civil government has been relatively evil insofar as mankind’s temporal well being is concerned. Furthermore, in an individualistic sense, civil government is always evil to someone. Certainly, Uriah would not have thought King David’s treatment of him to be a nice or a good thing (II Sam. 11:4, 15).

Wow. Quite a statement for a Christian to assimilate.

But wait there’s more.

Popular thinking that government is always a lesser evil than the extreme case of political anarchy is mistaken. Proponents of such thinking fail to reckon with the brutal record of civil government.

Bet that got your attention.

He gives an example of

those who have faced extermination at the hands of communists might not agree that the tyrannical government that dominated and oppressed them was better than anarchy.

Perhaps, but that wouldn’t mean that all civil government is evil all the time. Even the communists might have done something good.

He may be correct that “the existence of anarchy does not imply that society has neither rules nor order” but that does not mean it would work in this day and age. He believes the market would provide order, but that is too much to hope for that anyone but the most fervent believer in free markets to accept.

There is a danger of power which is why we must be vigilant.

We see an example in Revelation, where government is used by Satan to persecute the faithful remaining on the earth.

But wait there’s more. Joseph, an Old Testament hero seen as a picture of Christ, is criticized by Cobin for

bad, proactive economic policies where people were effectively swindled out of their land by the state (Gen 41:33-44). The state profited handsomely by the craftiness of Joseph.

Whew. This will be more than most Bible believing Christians can accept completely.

His solution? Christians should not actively participate in government.

The Appendix to Chapter 3 purportedly lists all policies of governments in the Bible and classifies them as good ambiguous or evil.

Chapter 4 continues looking at the Bible and government, looking at three key passages, Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-17 and Titus 3:1-2. Let’s just say that he practically reverses the commonly held view and does so unconvincingly.

Dr. Cobin believes that good government is the exception rather than the rule. He also feels that Christians are under no compulsion to obey every law. He spends most of Chapter 5 dealing with that. I would agree as long as the Christian is prepared to face the consequences, something Dr. Cobin appears unwilling to do.

Chapter 6 gives a policy analysis of the Christian and American public school. Suffice it to say that he believes

The public school has at once been both the greatest, most pernicious threat to liberty and American Christianity.

Few conservatives would disagree, hence the popularity of parochial and home schools.

The final chapter sums it up and gives a table of issues and how Christians should react.

I’ll have one more post on the book, or more correctly, on the author and my reaction.

Resurrection Sunday

Matthew 28

1 After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

2 There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. 3 His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. 4 The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men.

5 The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. 6 He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. 7 Then go quickly and tell his disciples: ‘He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.’ Now I have told you.”

8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

11 While the women were on their way, some of the guards went into the city and reported to the chief priests everything that had happened. 12 When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, 13 telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ 14 If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” 15 So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day.16 Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.

The resurrection is the basis for Christian belief. Christianity without the resurrection is simply another religion.

Good Friday

What was the worst thing that the Lord Jesus faced on that first Good Friday? What made him cry out in agony?

Was it when he went to the garden where He prayed alone to the Father in His emotional agony. When his disciples could not wait in prayer with him but were found by Him asleep three times. He must have cried out then.

No, not then.

Surely Jesus cried out when He was arrested in the garden, when, unarmed, he met the large crowd bearing clubs and swords that came to arrest him as they would a dangerous criminal. As one of his inner circle of 12 disciples betrayed him with a kiss and the rest fled in fear, he must have cried out then.

No, not then.

Then wasn’t it during his illegal trial, when men said lies about him, when he was accused of blasphemy and then his own spiritual leaders spit upon, slapped him, struck him with their fists, and mocked him.

No, not then, either.

Maybe it was when he saw Peter disowning him in front of the people outside the high priests house that night. When Peter swore and cursed and insisted he didn’t know him.

No, it wasn’t then.

Was it when he was before Pilate and the crowd, although asked several times by Pilate whether he should release Jesus, asked for Barabbas, and demanded Christ be crucified.

No, not then, either.

Surely he cried out when he was flogged. When he was whipped numerous times by a whip made of several strips of leather which were embedded near the ends with bits of bone and lead, the bits tearing at His skin and causing great physical trauma, trauma so great that often victims did not survive. He must have cried out then.

No, it wasn’t then.

Then he must have cried out after the flogging, when Roman soldiers wrapped his body in a robe and jammed a crown of thorns on his head. When they mocked him and spit on him and struck him with the staff they had given him. He cried out then, didn’t He?

No, not then.

So he must have cried out as He trudged to Golgotha, shouldering the heavy cross piece for part of the way, until he could bear the weight no longer, finally collapsing and helped by Simon the Cyrene. Facing the jeers of most of the crowd as he walked along the Via Dolorosa.

No, not then.

Well, then, at the cross, when he was nailed through the wrists without anesthesia, splitting the tissue, driving all the way through to the wood below. And then likewise the feet, fastening him firmly to the cross. Surely he cried out then.

No, not then.

Then when the cross was erected, the great weight falling into the hole, jerking the weak body, dislocating  his joints, initiating further physical agony on his respiratory system due to hyperextension of his lungs. His bleeding back further traumatized by the rough wood against it .

No, not then.

Was it when the crowd before hurled insults at his helpless and likely nude body, joined even by one who was crucified with him, all inciting him to take things into his own hands, to come down off the cross ahead of the Father’s plan, to take premature revenge on those who cried, “Blasphemer,” “Liar,” “Fool.” It must have been then he cried out.

No, not then.

About the sixth hour, noon time in our current system of keeping time, darkness fell on the earth and lasted for three hours. At the end of that time Jesus finally cried out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” At that time, when the sin of the whole world, past, present, and future, fell upon him and the Father, who can have nothing to do with evil, turned his back and the fellowship between Father and Son was broken for the one and only time during their existence.

That was when the Lord Jesus finally cried out in unbearable agony. And died.

New Mormon President, 80, Is Picked

The Mormons go with “youth.”

Thomas S. Monson [80] … was named on Monday as the 16th president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and immediately declared the 13 million-member denomination would not veer significantly from the course set by his predecessor, Gordon B. Hinckley, who died Jan. 27 at age 97.

Review of Bible and Government - part 2

Continuing my review of the book Bible and Government by Dr. John M. Cobin, we move into the first few chapters.

Dr. Cobin recognizes two rights, positive and negative. Negative rights are natural rights. Positive rights are those rights guaranteed by the government that people do not have naturally.

Dr. Cobin then sets out four categories of public policy.

  1. Reactive policy which is “action by government which is designed to provide a social service that the market cannot provide well.” The “pure” reactive policies he sets forth are national defense, legal rules based on the law of property, contract and tort, and criminal justice.
  2. Policies of inefficient public provision wherein, government provides a genuine good or service normally provided by the market.
  3. Proactive policy aimed at changing behavior (Big Brother or Nanny state policies).
  4. Proactive policy aimed at fostering redistribution wealth in conjunction with a social goal.

He then rails against two examples of #4, Social Security and student loans.

In Chapter 2,  he discusses modern public policy from a Biblical perspective.

First he says that “the Bible never suggests that the institution of government is in and of itself good.” This may come as a surprise to many Bible believers, as it did to me, whose view of government is conditioned by teaching on Romans 13:1-7. He further suggests that nationalism has no place for Christians, which I can agree with.

He spends a lot of time discussing Sept. 11, especially some of the talk of wanting to bomb or even nuke  Arab or Muslim population centers in retaliation.

Dr. Cobin contends that any non-reactive policy (i.e., other than #1 above) would be difficult to justify Biblically, even to go so far that a Christian should not voluntary benefit from those policies, and any such benefit would be sin.

He states that, from the Biblical record, “it seems that the main purpose for government is to serve as God’s minister for judgment.”

And he says, “It is the officials in civil government who usually become the greatest beneficiaries of the welfare state or rent seeking society–at the expense of their constituents.”

Strong words.

The Enlightenment of Nothingness

Televangelists Resign From Oral Roberts University board

Via FOXNews.com

Benny Hinn and I.V. Hilliard resigned as regents, where they were involved in making major school decisions, university spokesman Jeremy Burton said Thursday. Burton declined to say why the two resigned, but said both wrote the board to express their support for the school’s mission.

The resignations come a month after the resignations from the board of regents of two other televangelists, Jesse Duplantis and Creflo Dollar.

Hinn and Dollar are two evangelists under investigation by Sen. Charles Grassley.

Epiphany

From Wikipedia,

Epiphany … is a Christian feast…. Some Christians commemorate the visitation of the Magi to the child Jesus on this day, while others use the day to commemorate the baptism of Jesus as an adult. The feast is also called Twelfth Day — being the twelfth day after Christmas — or Three Kings Day for those commemorating the Magi. It is also called Theophany, especially by those commemorating Christ’s baptism.

I don’t believe epiphany is a holiday many evangelicals know about, even though we sing about it every year (”On the twelfth day of Christmas…”)
I’m not sure how many Greek Orthodox there are in Wisconsin, but in the Tampa Bay area, there’s a significant contingent,

As Tarpon Springs residents gear up for the 102nd Epiphany celebration this weekend, they are also welcoming visitors from the Greek islands, where many of the traditions originated.

Tarpon Springs

is known for elaborate religious ceremonies related to the Greek Orthodox Church such as Epiphany celebrated every January 6 with the blessing of the waters and the boats.

The blessings conclude with the ceremonial throwing of a wooden cross into the city’s Spring Bayou, and young men dive in to retrieve it: whoever recovers the cross is said to be blessed for a full year.

Get rich quick?

After posting on prosperity gospel teachers yesterday, a thought struck me as I saw this ad in Saturday’s Freeman.

retire-soon-ad-1.png

How different are these guys from those teachers? Basically both want to short cut the normal way of accumulating wealth. Some may be able to; most will not.

NOTE: I edited out the phone number. No sense giving these yahoos free advertising.

Sunday’s Journal Sentinel

Sunday’s paper provided a target-rich environment. But it’s Christmas and I don’t have time. But, briefly,

The powerful religious right still tries to play victim Yeah, poor us. I’ll believe that when Christianity is given the same tolerance other religions are. Don’t believe it?

Santa Claus, however, gets a big thumbs up. Yes, Virginia — a resounding yes.

Santa Claus? Now that’s tolerant. And favorable. Of course, no one would be against Santa, right?

Peace on Earth? Essential thought? Keep religion separate. Presumably from government. Yeah, just try.

Christianized GOP isn’t a new concept. No link on the MJS site, but Tim Rock kindly provides the entire text. Or maybe the MJS got the article from him.  You can find the original here, under a more appropriate title Hard Liners for Jesus. Myerson’s premise? Look through history and you can find a similar theme to the Religious Right Republicans. The KKK. Nice, huh? Can you imagine the outrage if I wrote something about, say, CAIR? You got it. I also love having a socialist tell me how to interpret the Bible.

The editorial board gave us Immigration: The message: Merry Christmas, go home, basically criticizing the immigration stance of the most evangelical Presidential candidate. Gotta love it when someone tells someone else what to believe. Oh wait only Christians do that.

So the Journal Sentinel, in seeking to assuage the culture war over Christmas, naturally brings attention to it in a way that will guarantee that it will continue.

Good, I’m glad I got that off my chest. Now I can enjoy Christmas.

Prophecies of Jesus Christ

Here’s a chart of 17 prophecies of the Messiah in the Old Testament that were fulfilled by Jesus in the New Testament.

The full chart can be found here. Another chart can be found here.

Prophetic Scripture Subject Fulfilled
Genesis 3:15 seed of a woman Galatians 4:4
Jeremiah 23:5-6 descendant of David Matthew 1:1
Micah 5:2 born in Bethlehem Luke 2:4-5, 7
Isaiah 7:14 to be born of a virgin Luke 1:26-27, 30-31
Jeremiah 31:15 slaughter of children Matthew 2:16-18
Hosea 11:1 flight to Egypt Matthew 2:14-15
Malachi 3:1 preceded by a forerunner Luke 7:24, 27
Psalms 78:2-4 speaks in parables Matthew 13:34-35
Isaiah 29:18, Isaiah 35:5-6 blind, deaf, and lame are healed Luke 7:22, Matthew 11:3-5
Isaiah 53:3, Isaiah 8:14 rejected by His own people, the Jews John 1:11, Luke 23:18
Zechariah 9:9 triumphal entry Mark 11:7, 9, 11
Zechariah 11:12 betrayed for thirty pieces of silver Matthew 26:14-15
Psalms 22:16 pierced through hands and feet John 20:25-27
Psalms 22:17-18 soldiers gambled for His clothing Matthew 27:35-36
Psalms 34:20 no bones broken John 19:32, 33, 36
Psalms 16:10, Psalms 30:3 to be resurrected Mark 16:6-7
Psalms 68:18, Psalms 110:1 His ascension to God’s right hand Mark 16:19

A strange way to save the world

Peter has posted on one of my favorite Christmas songs. I’m going to post on another. It may be my favorite because I’ve sung it in church (decades ago now, it seems). Here are the lyrics:

I’m sure he must have been surprised
At where this road had taken him
Cause never in a million lives
Would he have dreamed of Bethleham
And standing at the manger
He saw with his own eyes
The message from the angel come to life
And Joseph said…

(chorus)
Why me, I’m just a simple man of trade?
Why him, with all the rulers in the world?
Why here, inside this stable filled with hay?
Why her, she’s just an ordinary girl?
Now I’m not one to second guess what angels have to say
But this is such a strange way to save the world

To think of how it could have been
If Jesus had come as he deserved
There would have been no bethlehem
No lowly shepherds at his birth
But Joseph knew the reson
The love had to reach so far
And as he held the savior in his arms
He must have thought…

(Repeat Chorus)

La la la la la la la la la la la

Now, I’m not one to second guess what angels have to say
But this is such a strange way
Such a strange way
Such a strange way

To save the world

Here’s a slide show with the song.

The Women in Jesus’ Family Tree

In this Christmas season, sometimes it’s good to remember four unusual women in Jesus’ family tree, not to mention some pretty ungodly men.

And yet, there they are, Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba. In the first chapter of the New Testament. In the genealogy of the Son of God.

Amazing.

Evangelists respond

Updating this post.

Joyce Meyer: Fully cooperating (a tip of the conservative cap to Bold Color Conservative). Web Site. Financial accountability page.

Creflo Dollar: No, we have not given him the information that he has requested, simply because we don’t believe we are under any legal obligations to have to do it when the IRS has already been given the authority to act as a tax examiner and not a Committee. Interview with Larry King (Transcript scroll down about 4 times). Web site.

Paula WhiteInterview with Larry King (Transcript). Web site. Financial disclosure page.

Bishop Eddie Long: It’s an attack on our religious freedom and privacy rights ( a tip of the conservative cap to Media Outrage). Web site.

Benny Hinn: Web Site.

Kenneth Copeland: Web Site. Financial Accountability page.