Today’s edition comes from James Wigderson,
Of course, I’m just shocked, shocked, at the possibility that ridership numbers might be inflated.
Yeah, me, too.
A Wisconsin conservative Christian writes about, well, whatever I feel like
A Wisconsin conservative Christian writes about, well, whatever I feel like
Today’s edition comes from James Wigderson,
Of course, I’m just shocked, shocked, at the possibility that ridership numbers might be inflated.
Yeah, me, too.
That’s right. Look at how this Craig Gilbert article in Sunday’s Milwaukee Journal Sentinel starts:
You won’t find too many Democrats these days attacking their conservative opponents for being soft on gun rights.
But that’s exactly what Sen. Russ Feingold did last week in a radio ad, trading fire with GOP challenger Ron Johnson over who’s a better friend of the Second Amendment.
“I have been one of the true leaders in fighting for a greater right to bear arms,” Feingold said in an interview last week.
My conservative friends are guffawing about now, and although Feingold doesn’t get good marks from the NRA, neither does he seem to get good marks from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
It seems mixed enough. he even seems to support concealed carry.
Not good enough for either side.
A maverick?
At least on guns.
Look, I’ll never vote for Feingold.
But he does seem to be a moderate on gun control.
A moderate? A DINO?
Nahhh.
“In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life.”
via LA Times.
Ms. Rice comes at Christianity from her Catholic persuasion and I agree with some of her criticisms.
And some also depends on what she means by “anti”.
For example, I believe Democrats are wrong most of the time on most issues. Does that make me “anti?” If so, oh well. In fact the terminology confuses me.
Which makes me think she’s confused.
Republican candidates for governor Scott Walker and Mark Neumann drew few contrasts on Friday in the first of three debates before the Sept. 14 primary.
via Madison.com.
There’s a reason for that–they’re both conservative!
The rest of the crap that’s happened in this campaign is because there is basically no ideological difference between Walker and Neumann.
So it’s degenerated, for the most part into “You do this.” No, I don’t.” kind of campaign.
Distasteful to many (mostly in SE Wisconsin) who would simply like to anoint Scott Walker as the Republican nominee, I’m sure, it will be invaluable should Walker (yes, he still has to win the primary) win the nomination.
The only question is if such bitter campaigning leaves the winner without the support of the loser.